Gambling Lawsuits by Company

155 companies, platforms and public bodies appear as parties in the 207 gambling lawsuits on record as of 14 November 2026, and one of them, Kalshi, sits in 5 cases as plaintiff or defendant.

This page lists every company page, counts its cases and says whether a claim is open. Which of these companies has ever paid a player? Only a few have, and the sections below say which.

Counts match cases to a company's legal entities and brands; a case naming several operators counts once for each; the method is published with the open data.

Companies with a consumer claim open right now

Three companies have a consumer claim open as of 14 November 2026: Yellow Social Interactive (Pulsz six-state settlement, elections to 30 November 2026), High 5 Games (Larsen settlement, claims to 4 January 2027, per the administrator's site) and VGW (New York Attorney General assurance, Sweeps Coin redemption for New Yorkers to 31 August 2027, one year after the effective date); every other company on this page has no claim form and no payout date.

A payout estimate, where one exists, is shown only on the tracker with its formula (fund, fee share, claim rate, caps). The record of all gambling lawsuits by category holds the rest.

Deadlines and the estimate formula for each are on the list of open gambling class action settlements by deadline. The Pulsz hearing is set for 31 December 2026.

How to read a company page

Every company page opens with a key-facts box (legal entities and brands covered, parent, case count, open settlement yes or no with its date), then answers the payout question honestly, then lists every case with court, docket, status and its date.

A complaint states one side's allegations; only the court's orders decide anything. Brands are grouped, so Chumba Casino, LuckyLand Slots and Global Poker sit on the VGW page; the method is in how every case is sourced and checked.

• A key-facts box with entities, parent and case count
• "Is there a settlement or payout right now"
• A table of every lawsuit
• An arbitration-clause section

Operators by number of cases

Six operator groups account for more than 23 percent of all cases in the record, and most of their cases are American.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks: Kalshi, DraftKings, FanDuel, Polymarket, Robinhood

Kalshi is a party in 5 cases, a defendant in 2, with no settlement and no certified consumer class; DraftKings follows with 3, Polymarket with 2, Robinhood with 1 and FanDuel with 1. DraftKings' 1 settled matters include the Dufoe NFT settlement (USD 10 million, paid, claims closed 21 July 2025) and no addiction case. The prediction market lawsuits category holds the full list.

Sweepstakes and social casinos: VGW, Pulsz, Stake.us, Playtika, High 5, Modo

VGW (Chumba Casino, LuckyLand Slots, Global Poker) is named in 2 cases, all in the United States, with one closed Kentucky settlement (USD 11.75 million, claims closed 6 March 2023) and the New York redemption running to 31 August 2027.

Stake.us appears in 0, Playtika in 1 (Slotomania settlement USD 38 million, final approval 11 February 2021), Pulsz in 1, Modo Casino in 0 and High 5 in 1. All of them sit in the sweepstakes casino lawsuits category.

European and Australian operators: Flutter, Entain, bet365, Unibet, Tipico, Star, Crown

Flutter (Paddy Power, Sky Bet, Betfair) appears in 7 cases across ten jurisdictions, Entain (Ladbrokes, bwin, Neds) in 6, Unibet in 4, bet365 in 1, Star Entertainment in 4, Novomatic in 2, Tipico in 2 and Crown Resorts in 1. Crown's two shareholder settlements (AUD 125 million, final 29 April 2022, and AUD 72.5 million in three installments to 10 May 2027) are its settlements on this page.

Ashton v Betfair was dismissed on 13 November 2026 ([2026] EWHC 2935 (KB)), the third United Kingdom duty-of-care defeat after Calvert and Gibson. The German and Austrian refund judgments against Tipico, Entain and Flutter entities are individual judgments, not settlements.

Game studios, platforms and suppliers: Apple, Google, Epic, Roblox, Aristocrat, Light & Wonder

Apple and Google each appear in 1 and 1 cases as app-store defendants in sweepstakes and social-casino suits, Electronic Arts in 2, Epic Games in 1, Roblox in 1, Aristocrat in 2 and SciPlay in 0. Aristocrat's Big Fish settlement is USD 155 million (final approval 11 February 2021), and SciPlay's six-state settlement paid from 6 March 2026. The loot box and video game gambling lawsuits category covers the studios.

The USD 127.5 million Dragon Train settlement between Aristocrat and Light & Wonder (11 January 2026) is a dispute between companies, not a consumer fund.

Every company in the record, by case count

A company is counted once per case, whichever of its entities or brands is named; the grouping method and alias list are published with the open data.

Public bodies that appear as parties

32 of the company pages are not companies but regulators, attorneys general, ministries and tax offices that sued an operator or were sued by one: Spelinspektionen in 11 Swedish sanction appeals, Italy's Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli in 7, the Kansspelautoriteit in 3 and the GGL in 2. Their cases are described in each country's enforcement section.

Criminal matters in this table are allegations only: a defendant is charged, not convicted, until a court says otherwise. The wider list is in regulators and attorneys general in court.

Questions people ask

Can you file a lawsuit against a casino?

Yes, and the record shows which grounds have worked: illegal-gambling and loss-recovery statutes in the United States, void contracts in Germany and Austria, and not duty of care in the United Kingdom, where the claims have failed. The grounds and their cases are in the guide to can you sue a casino or sportsbook.

Is there a DraftKings, FanDuel or Kalshi payout?

No: no DraftKings or FanDuel class has a payout except the Dufoe NFT settlement, which has paid, and no Kalshi case has produced a settlement, claim form or payment date. The next dated events sit on each company page.

Is it worth joining a class action against an operator?

A class member who does nothing is usually bound and may receive the default benefit, while a member who opts out keeps the right to sue alone. The trade-offs case by case are on the join, opt out or sue alone guide.

What this page does not cover

This page rates no operator, keeps no blacklist, and does not say whether a casino is safe, how to lift a ban or how to withdraw; it counts court cases. Which operators had a consumer class sent to arbitration is kept on the tracker of gambling cases and arbitration clauses.

Sources and method

Each company's count is the number of cases in the record whose parties or caption match the company's legal entities and brands as listed in the published operator-group file; 80 company pages match no case under this method and are listed for review in the corrections log.

Primary sources are named per case: dockets and orders (GovInfo, CourtListener, state portals), administrator sites, attorney general assurances, and ASX and SEC filings for the shareholder matters. Errors and unmatched pages are tracked on the corrections page.

GamblingLawsuits.org is a free, non-profit reference with no operator advertising; we are not a law firm and not a claims administrator. The grouping method and alias list download with our open data.

Edited by the GamblingLawsuits.org Editorial Team. Last checked 14 November 2026.