No correction to a published page is on record as of 14 November 2026; this page lists every one from the day the first is made, with the page, the date, what was wrong and the document that settled it. It exists so that anyone can see how errors on this site are handled.
What counts as a correction, and what is an update
A correction fixes a statement that was wrong when it was published: a docket number, a date, an amount, a party, a status that the record did not support. It is made in place, and it is dated.
An update is a change in the world after publication, such as a new order, a moved deadline or a payment made. It changes the status and its date on the page and the "last checked" date, and it is not a correction. Both are handled under the editorial policy and independence.
How a correction is shown
The page keeps its address and the case keeps its stable identifier; the wrong value is replaced, a dated correction note is added to the page, and the same change appears in the downloadable files at the next build. A reader sees five things:
- a dated note on the page that carries the fix
- an entry in the log below
- the record changed in place, with the identifier unchanged
- the "last checked" date moved to the day of the check
- where two sources conflict, the court record wins and the conflict is named in the note
The corrected value reaches the downloadable case files at the next build, and those files are described on the page for the open data download of the case records.
Corrections to published pages
The table is rendered from the corrections record and carries 0 entries as of 14 November 2026. Each entry will show the date, the page, the statement as published, the statement as corrected and the document that settled it. No entry yet.
No entry yet.
Claims we checked and could not confirm
Some statements circulate in press or in trackers that the court record does not support as of 14 November 2026; they are not corrections of this site, they are what the record says instead.
| Claim seen elsewhere | What the record says as of 14 November 2026 | Owner page |
|---|---|---|
| "The Supreme Court declined the Kalshi cases on 1 October 2026" | Three petitions are pending: No. 26-299 (Flaherty v. KalshiEX, filed 2 September 2026, docket), No. 26-338 (Robinhood v. Dreitzer, filed 10 September 2026) and No. 26-344 (NADEX v. Nevada, filed 11 September 2026). Responses are due 7 December 2026 and there is no order. | prediction market lawsuits: Kalshi, Polymarket and the States |
| "Ohio fined Kalshi USD 5 million" | The Ohio Casino Control Commission issued a notice of intent to fine on 14 April 2026, and Kalshi challenged it in Franklin County Common Pleas on 29 June 2026 (status filed as of 29 September 2026; see the Tennessee attorney general opinion for the status). The notice is not public, and the amount is reported as USD 5 million by one tracker, not confirmed in a public document. |
Ohio fine against Kalshi |
| "The Roblox gambling case has a settlement or a claim form" | There is no settlement, no judgment and no claim form. Colvin v. Roblox (N.D. Cal., No. 3:23-cv-04146-VC) stands at motion-to-dismiss as of 10 December 2025. |
Roblox Robux gambling class action |
The owner pages carry the detail and the sources for each row, including the court documents behind the status named here.
How to report an error
Name the page and the statement, and link the court document, administrator notice or regulator decision that shows the error; the contact form on the imprint page takes the report, topic "Correction or factual error".
The editorial team replies by email, usually within two working days. A confirmed error is fixed and dated, and a disputed one is noted as disputed with both sources shown.
The form does not take legal advice requests, claim filings or status checks, and the route for sourcing questions is how every case is sourced and checked.
Questions people ask
Who decides whether a statement is wrong?
The court record decides: an order, a docket entry or a filed document beats a press report, a tracker or a company statement, and where only secondary sources exist the page says so. The conflict itself is named in the correction note.
Is the record independent of the companies it covers?
Yes: the site takes no money from operators, affiliates or law firms and links no operator site, and the charter sets that out. Read our charter: no operators, no ads, no law-firm money for the full terms.
Where is the method for sourcing a case described?
Every case page names its sources with a primary or secondary flag and a last-checked date, and the method behind that is set out in full. Open items are listed on the case page as "Not yet verified", and the methodology page explains how sources are chosen.
What this page does not cover
Changes in a case's status are not corrections and are not listed here; they appear on the case page with their date and on the category hubs. Every hub is reachable from the page for all gambling lawsuits by category.
Sources and method
This page rests on the site's own published record: 198 of 207 case records carry a status read from a court document, the rest say which press release, regulator decision or tracker they rest on, and every open item is listed on the case page as "Not yet verified".
GamblingLawsuits.org is a non-commercial project. It takes no money from operators, affiliates or law firms. Filing a settlement claim is always free. This site is not a law firm and not a claims administrator. The rules for handling errors are part of the editorial policy.