FanDuel Lawsuits: Every Case, What Settled, and Whether There Is a Payout

1 lawsuits name a FanDuel entity as of 14 November 2026: 0 gambling-addiction suits, 0 sportsbook and daily fantasy cases, and others over patents, data, antitrust, the founders' sale and attorney-general enforcement. Three lines run through them: addiction and "addictive design" claims, the legality of daily fantasy contests, and state or federal enforcement.

Has any of it put money back in a bettor's account? No. None of the settled matters, the oldest from 2016, paid a FanDuel customer, and every addiction and design suit is still pending.

Status is the court record, not press reports; the Texas dismissal orders of 5 August 2026 rest on one law-firm report. Checked 14 November 2026.

Is there a FanDuel settlement or payout right now?

No. There is no FanDuel settlement open to players, no claim form and no payout date as of 14 November 2026, and no FanDuel case on record has ever paid money to a FanDuel customer.

The settled cases paid others: USD 375,000 to responsible-gaming organizations (MDL 2677, approved 8 June 2022) and USD 6 million to New York State (25 October 2016). These cases sit among the sports betting lawsuits: DraftKings, FanDuel and the addiction and promotion cases, where no addiction or promotion class action has produced a payout.

A complaint states one side's allegations, and only the court's orders decide anything. The table shows the money that moved and who received it.

5 gambling settlements accept claims today, none naming FanDuel, and each deadline is on the open gambling class action settlements by deadline tracker.

Every lawsuit against FanDuel (1 cases, CSV)

The table lists all 1 cases in which a FanDuel entity is a named party as of 14 November 2026, with court and docket, filing date, status and its date, and the source we read. Four further matters, with FanDuel as intervenor, alliance member or subject, are in the plaintiff section below.

The same records download as CSV from open data: download the case database under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Class actions and individual suits: addiction, daily fantasy, withdrawals

0 of the 1 cases were filed as class actions and 0 by individuals, and no class has been certified against FanDuel. Which of these has a judge ruled on?

Gambling addiction and "addictive design" suits, 2024 to 2026

Suits since October 2024 plead that FanDuel's app, promotions and VIP hosts cultivated or exploited gambling addiction, and none has reached a ruling on the merits: Patel (S.D.N.Y., filed 1 October 2024, arbitration motion reported February 2025), Sage and Thompson (Philadelphia, 24 March 2026), Arroyo (Suffolk Superior Court, 25 March 2026), Farley (S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-03464-ER, 27 April 2026), the City of Baltimore (filed 3 April 2025) and a Louisiana class action filed 22 October 2026.

The pleadings share micro-betting and design features, VIP hosts and a product-liability framing. Patel seeks USD 250 million, sought and not awarded, while serving a 6.5-year federal sentence for embezzling USD 22 million.

The same theories met DraftKings-only rulings: De Leon was dismissed on 11 December 2025 and Macek on 23 March 2026, now on appeal. See gambling addiction lawsuits against operators.

Daily fantasy legality: California, Illinois and the 2016 MDL

FanDuel's daily fantasy contests have been litigated in three forums: the California class actions Beltran (N.D. Cal. 25-cv-5586, withdrawn 8 September 2025 under a tolling agreement) and Criswell (3:25-cv-10473, filed 5 December 2025), the Illinois Loss Recovery Act test case Dew-Becker v.

Wu (Illinois Supreme Court, 16 April 2020, contests held skill, recovery denied; FanDuel not a party), and the Boston MDL that settled in 2021 and 2022.

Criswell asks the court to apply the four-year UCL period rather than FanDuel's one-year contractual period.

In the MDL most player claims were sent to arbitration on 27 November 2019, as reported, and the FanDuel side ended in the USD 375,000 cy pres payment. The state-by-state rules are in gambling loss recovery statutes by US state.

Withdrawals and live scores: Manganaro and Melnick

Two consumer class actions attack FanDuel's handling of money and data rather than its legality: Manganaro (Camden County Superior Court L-763-22, filed 24 March 2022) over refused withdrawals of unwagered deposits under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, and Melnick (N.D. Ill. 1:21-cv-01178, filed 2 March 2021) over delayed live scores during in-play betting.

As alleged, Manganaro deposited USD 500, lost USD 200 and was refused a USD 300 withdrawal; it has no verified ruling, and a dismissal of Melnick dated 29 September 2021 is not confirmed against the docket. Disputes over refused winnings are in sue a sportsbook that refuses to pay: jackpots, voided bets, frozen accounts.

State and regulator enforcement: New York, Texas, Baltimore and the FTC

The New York Attorney General's 2015 suit is the only enforcement case against FanDuel decided by a court: Justice Mendez enjoined DraftKings and FanDuel from taking New York entries on 11 December 2015 (Index No. 453054/2015), the Appellate Division stayed the order within hours, and the false-advertising claims settled on 25 October 2016 for USD 6 million from each company with no consumer restitution.

Baltimore was the first municipality to sue sportsbooks, under its Consumer Protection Ordinance, seeking penalties and an injunction rather than refunds.

The case was removed in May 2025 and remanded under Burford abstention on 10 November 2025 (one press report says 17 November), and the remand is on appeal in the Fourth Circuit (25-2372), set for argument in Richmond on 8 December 2026 while the state case is paused.

The FTC sued on 19 June 2017 over a merger that would have given one firm more than 90 percent of paid daily fantasy; the companies abandoned it on 13 July 2017 and the complaint was dismissed on 14 July 2017.

In Texas, FanDuel settled with Attorney General Paxton and left the state in 2016, per a law-firm summary an administrative settlement, not a court case. Other cases of this kind are in regulators and attorneys general in court.

FanDuel as plaintiff, intervenor and subject: Chicago, Texas, Fox and the founders

Four more matters concern FanDuel without naming a FanDuel entity as a party: DraftKings v.

Paxton (Texas, filed 4 March 2016; FanDuel intervened in 2018; nonsuited 30 July 2026, orders 5 August 2026, per a law-firm report not yet confirmed on the Travis County docket, and no Texas court ever ruled on daily fantasy legality), Sports Betting Alliance v.

City of Chicago (Cook County 2025CH12984, filed 30 December 2025), Fox v. Flutter (JAMS award of 4 November 2022, FanDuel valued at USD 20 billion) and Eccles v. Shamrock (Index No. 651223/2020).

Eccles is the founders' suit over the May 2018 sale to Paddy Power Betfair at a USD 559 million valuation: the Appellate Division ruled on 13 October 2022, the Court of Appeals on 23 May 2024 (fiduciary breach under Scots law adequately alleged), and a renewed motion to dismiss was reported denied in July 2026. The Flutter side is on Flutter (Paddy Power, Sky Bet, Betfair) lawsuits.

What changed in the last 60 days

0 FanDuel cases were filed or changed status between 15 September and 14 November 2026 in the record; the most recent is the Louisiana class action filed on 22 October 2026, followed by the Texas dismissal orders of 5 August 2026 and the July 2026 denial of the renewed motion to dismiss in Eccles, both per press or law-firm reports.

• 22 October 2026: Louisiana class action filed in Orleans Parish (No. 2026-09867), per DraftKings' exchange filing.
• 5 August 2026: Texas dismissal orders in DraftKings v. Paxton.
• 15 July 2026: Eccles renewed motion to dismiss reported denied.
• 27 April 2026: Farley filed.
• 25 March 2026: Arroyo filed.
• 24 March 2026: Sage and Thompson filed.
• 5 December 2025: Criswell filed.
• 12 November 2025: Baltimore remand appealed.

The one dated next event is the Fourth Circuit argument in the Baltimore appeal on 8 December 2026, and the what changed in gambling litigation in the last 60 days tracker lists every move site-wide.

How courts treated FanDuel's arbitration clause

No court order compelling arbitration against a FanDuel customer is in the record: FanDuel moved to compel individual arbitration and stay Patel's USD 250 million suit in February 2025 and the ruling is not confirmed in the court record, Farley's defendants had not answered at the last check, and Criswell asks the court to displace FanDuel's one-year contractual limitation period.

The one arbitration ruling that bound FanDuel players is the MDL order of 27 November 2019, as reported, sending most player claims to arbitration, after which only the family-member claims settled. The cases sent to arbitration or kept in court are listed on gambling cases sent to arbitration or kept in court.

Entities and brands on this page

This page merges every FanDuel entity named in the record: FanDuel Inc. (also pleaded as FanDuel, Inc.), FanDuel Limited, FanDuel Group Parent LLC, FanDuel Deposits, LLC, Betfair Interactive US LLC (doing business as FanDuel Sportsbook, pleaded in five spellings), the bare name FanDuel, and the former FanDuel directors sued in Eccles.

Flutter Entertainment plc and DraftKings, co-defendants in many captions, keep their own hubs, and the index is gambling lawsuits by company.

Questions people ask

Has anyone sued FanDuel?

Yes: 1 lawsuits name a FanDuel entity, the earliest the New York Attorney General's suit of 17 November 2015 and the latest, in the record of 14 November 2026, a Louisiana class action filed on 22 October 2026, and none of the settled cases paid a FanDuel customer. Where FanDuel sits among every gambling lawsuit is shown by all gambling lawsuits by category.

Is there a FanDuel class action settlement payout per person?

There is no FanDuel payout per person because no FanDuel settlement has paid class members: the MDL's FanDuel side was a USD 375,000 cy pres donation and the New York settlement went to the state. How per-person figures are built when a fund exists is explained in class action payout per person: what gambling settlements paid each claimant.

The one sportsbook settlement that paid claimants is DraftKings' USD 10 million NFT settlement (claims closed 21 July 2025, paid), with no FanDuel involvement. Every DraftKings case is on DraftKings lawsuits.

Why are people suing FanDuel?

The pending suits plead three things: that the app and its promotions were designed to deepen gambling addiction (Patel, Sage and Thompson, Arroyo, Farley, Baltimore), that paid daily fantasy is illegal sports wagering in California (Criswell), and that FanDuel mishandled deposits or live data (Manganaro, Melnick); none has been decided. The grounds that have worked against casinos and sportsbooks elsewhere are on can you sue a casino or sportsbook: grounds that have worked.

Does FanDuel return money, and can a customer sue when it will not pay out?

The only FanDuel case on this point, Manganaro v. FanDuel (New Jersey, 2022), alleges refused withdrawals of unwagered deposits and has no verified ruling. Court cases over jackpots, voided bets and frozen accounts across operators are collected on casino or sportsbook that refuses to pay: the court cases.

What this page does not cover

Which states FanDuel operates in, whether it is safe to bet with, and how it pays winnings and refunds are product and availability questions outside this record; regulator fines that never reached a court are also outside it.

Whether joining a class action is wise depends on the settlement terms, and the choices are laid out in join, opt out or sue alone: what a gambling class settlement gives up and keeps.

Sources and method

Of the 1 cases on this page, 1 carry a status read directly from a court or agency record; the rest rest on complaints hosted by press or counsel, regulator releases and trade reports, each flagged in the table.

Primary sources are the FTC case pages, GovInfo for MDL 2677, the Federal Circuit opinion in Beteiro, the Fourth Circuit argument calendar and the Texas Attorney General release; trackers are leads only. The methodology page explains the checks, and errors are logged on corrections.

Filing a claim is free. GamblingLawsuits.org is a non-profit public record, not a law firm and not a claims administrator, and it carries no advertising and no operator links.