- Status
- Dismissed (dismissed)
- As of
- 14 Jul 2017 · read from the court record
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (preliminary injunction); FTC administrative proceeding · Regulatory or administrative court
- Docket
- FTC Docket No. 9375 (Matter 161 0174, administrative); D.D.C. 1:17-cv-01195 (TRO/PI complaint filed 2017-06-19)
- Filed
- 19 Jun 2017
- Type
- Regulator v. operator, antitrust and competition cases
- Money
- No settlement fund or award on record
- Payout
- No payout exists as of 14 Nov 2026
Status words follow the court record: a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Filing a settlement claim is always free.
What this case is about
On 19 June 2017 the FTC voted 2-0 to sue in D.D.C. for a preliminary injunction and issued an administrative complaint (trial set for 21 November 2017). The companies abandoned the merger in July 2017 rather than litigate. The only US merger challenge in the gambling-adjacent sector to date and the reason the two firms still compete.
What this case is about
The Federal Trade Commission, with the Attorneys General of California and the District of Columbia, challenged the proposed merger of DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel Limited.
The record lists FTC Docket No. 9375 (administrative) and U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia case 1:17-cv-01195. It is an antitrust and competition lawsuit brought by regulators, not by consumers.
On 19 June 2017 the FTC voted 2-0 to sue for a preliminary injunction and issued an administrative complaint, with an administrative trial set for 21 November 2017.
The FTC alleged under Clayton Act section 7 and FTC Act section 5 that the merger would give one firm more than 90 percent of the US paid daily fantasy sports market.
Who is covered
The case concerns the two largest paid daily fantasy sports companies and the players and competitors in that market. No class of consumers sued.
The federal court filing was in Washington, D.C.; see gambling lawsuits in the District of Columbia. One of the defendants has its own page: DraftKings lawsuits.
Is there a payout?
No payout exists in this case. It was a regulator's challenge to a merger, and the record shows no damages, no fund and no consumer claim process.
The case ended before any ruling on the merits. There is nothing to claim.
What the court decided
A complaint states one side's allegations, and no court ruled on them. The companies abandoned the merger on 13 July 2017 rather than litigate.
On 13 July 2017 the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the complaint, and the Commission issued its order dismissing the complaint on 14 July 2017. As of 14 November 2026 the status is dismissed.
The FTC's press release and case pages hold the documents. The two firms still compete today.
Why it matters
The case is the only US merger challenge in the gambling-adjacent sector to date and the reason the two firms still compete. The FTC never obtained an order blocking the merger; the challenge ended because the companies abandoned the deal in July 2017.
More cases of this type sit under antitrust and competition lawsuits.
Questions people ask
Did a court block the DraftKings-FanDuel merger?
No court ruled. After the FTC and two state attorneys general sued in June 2017, the companies abandoned the merger, and the complaint was dismissed on 14 July 2017.
Is it worth joining a class action lawsuit over this?
There is no class action here. The FTC acted as a regulator, and the record shows no fund, claim form or payout.
Why did the FTC object?
The FTC alleged the merger would give one firm more than 90 percent of the US paid daily fantasy sports market. That is the FTC's allegation, not a court finding.
Who is involved
Plaintiffs: Federal Trade Commission; Attorneys General of California and the District of Columbia
| Defendants | DraftKings, Inc.; FanDuel Limited |
|---|---|
| Claims |
|
Is there a payout?
No payout exists in this case as of 14 Nov 2026.
What happens next
No future date is on the record we hold. The case is closed on the record we hold; later appeals or enforcement steps would be added here.
Timeline
2 dated steps on record, oldest first. Future dates come from court notices and can move.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 19 Jun 2017 | Filed |
| 14 Jul 2017 | Dismissed |
Documents and sources
4 primary sources (court file, administrator notice, regulator) and 1 secondary. Press is supporting evidence only.
| What it supports | Source | Type | Retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|
| date, court, co-plaintiffs, 90 percent share, administrative trial date, 2-0 vote | ftc.gov | n/a | 14 Nov 2026 |
| federal case number 1:17-cv-01195, complaint 19 June 2017; 13 July 2017 statement on abandonment | ftc.gov | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
| Joint Motion to Dismiss Complaint 13 July 2017; Commission Order Dismissing Complaint 14 July 2017 | ftc.gov | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
| Commission Order Dismissing Complaint dated 14 July 2017 | ftc.gov | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
| case pages with the docket timeline | ftc.gov | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
Last checked against the sources on 14 Nov 2026. Found an error? Tell us and we correct the record with a dated note.