- Status
- Judgment entered (judgment)
- As of
- 15 Dec 2017 · read from the court record
- Court
- Hoge Raad der Nederlanden · Supreme or high court
- Docket
- 17/01386 (ECLI:NL:HR:2017:3130)
- Filed
- not on record
- Type
- Individual suit, gambling tax litigation
- Money
- kansspelbelasting assessment of EUR 1,015,492 on a Westdeutsche Lotterie jackpot of EUR 3,501,699.60 won on 28 April 2012 (shared with three others) upheld; cassation appeal dismissed 15 Dec 2017
- Payout
- No payout exists as of 14 Nov 2026
Status words follow the court record: a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Filing a settlement claim is always free.
What this case is about
The Hoge Raad confirmed that a Dutch resident's winnings from the German Lotto are subject to Dutch kansspelbelasting, rejecting the EU-law objections.
What this case is about
Hoge Raad 17/01386 (ECLI:NL:HR:2017:3130) is a cassation ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, dated 15 December 2017. A Dutch resident who won a prize in a German lottery appealed a Dutch gambling-tax assessment against the Staatssecretaris van Financiën (the Dutch state secretary for finance).
The winner relied on EU free movement, arguing that Dutch tax on a foreign lottery prize was unlawful. The claims concern the Wet op de kansspelbelasting (the Dutch gambling-tax act) as applied to foreign lottery winnings. The case belongs to Gambling Tax Litigation, which tracks tax disputes between operators, players and the courts.
Who is covered
This is an individual case, not a class action. The prize was a Westdeutsche Lotterie jackpot of EUR 3,501,699.60, won on 28 April 2012 and shared with three others.
The ruling applies to Dutch residents who win in foreign lotteries. Other Dutch cases are collected under Gambling Lawsuits in the Netherlands.
Is there a payout?
No payout exists in this case. The money in the record is a tax assessment payable by the winner, not a fund paid to players.
The kansspelbelasting assessment (naheffingsaanslag) was EUR 1,015,492 on the prize of EUR 3,501,699.60. The court upheld it, so the amount stays owed.
What the court decided
The Hoge Raad ruled on 15 December 2017, so the case is decided as of 14 November 2026. It dismissed the cassation appeal as unfounded (ongegrond).
The court confirmed that a Dutch resident's winnings from the German Lotto are subject to Dutch kansspelbelasting. It rejected the EU-law objections raised by the winner.
The assessment of EUR 1,015,492 was therefore upheld. The court's published text is the primary source.
Why it matters
The case answers a question that arises whenever a resident wins abroad: which country's gambling tax applies. Here the Dutch court held that Dutch tax applies to a Dutch resident's foreign prize, and that EU free movement did not change that result.
For how tax treats money from gambling claims, see Are Gambling Settlement Payments Taxable, which gathers IRS, ATO, HMRC and BFH references.
Questions people ask
Do Dutch residents owe tax on foreign lottery wins?
According to this ruling, yes. The Hoge Raad confirmed on 15 December 2017 that a Dutch resident's German Lotto winnings are subject to Dutch kansspelbelasting.
How much tax was assessed?
The naheffingsaanslag was EUR 1,015,492 on a prize of EUR 3,501,699.60. The prize was won on 28 April 2012 and shared with three others.
Did the EU free-movement argument work?
No. The Hoge Raad rejected the EU-law objections and dismissed the cassation appeal.
Who is involved
Plaintiffs: Dutch resident who won a German lottery prize
| Defendants | Staatssecretaris van Financiën |
|---|---|
| Claims |
|
Is there a payout?
No payout exists in this case as of 14 Nov 2026. The court record shows kansspelbelasting assessment of EUR 1,015,492 on a Westdeutsche Lotterie jackpot of EUR 3,501,699.60 won on 28 April 2012 (shared with three others) upheld; cassation appeal dismissed 15 Dec 2017.
What happens next
No future date is on the record we hold. The case is closed on the record we hold; later appeals or enforcement steps would be added here.
Timeline
1 dated step on record, oldest first. Future dates come from court notices and can move.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 15 Dec 2017 | Judgment entered |
Documents and sources
3 primary sources (court file, administrator notice, regulator) and 0 secondary. Press is supporting evidence only.
- Court document: data.rechtspraak.nl
| What it supports | Source | Type | Retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR 15 Dec 2017 ECLI:NL:HR:2017:3130 (V-N 2017/62.12 summary via SERP) | deeplink.rechtspraak.nl | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
| HR 15 Dec 2017, 17/01386 | data.rechtspraak.nl | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
| HR 15 Dec 2017 (17/01386): beroep in cassatie ongegrond; prize EUR 3,501,699.60; naheffingsaanslag EUR 1,015,492 | data.rechtspraak.nl | primary | 14 Nov 2026 |
Last checked against the sources on 14 Nov 2026. Found an error? Tell us and we correct the record with a dated note.