GamblingLawsuits.org
  1. Home
  2. Cases
  3. Gambling Tax Litigation
  4. Bundesgericht: table-game commissions are taxable gross gaming revenue

Case record · Gambling Tax Litigation

Bundesgericht: table-game commissions are taxable gross gaming revenue: Allegations, Court Orders and Status

Status
Judgment entered (judgment)
As of
31 Aug 2012 · read from the court record
Court
Bundesgericht (Schweizerisches Bundesgericht), II. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung · Supreme or high court
Docket
2C_320/2012 (parallel judgments 2C_321/2012 and 2C_322/2012 of the same day, 31 Aug 2012, against two other casinos; not joined)
Filed
Apr 2012
Type
Operator v. regulator, gambling tax litigation
Money
assessment of CHF 4,799,814.69 Spielbankenabgabe 2009 on CHF 11,962,962.65 gross gaming revenue reinstated; CHF 3,000 costs on the casino
Payout
No payout exists as of 14 Nov 2026

Status words follow the court record: a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Filing a settlement claim is always free.

What this case is about

The Bundesverwaltungsgericht had excluded the commissions casinos charge at poker and other table games from the gross gaming revenue on which the federal casino levy is assessed. On the ESBK's appeal the Bundesgericht held that 'Spieleinsatz' covers everything the player puts into the pot and that the commission is part of gross gaming revenue under the clear wording of the ordinance, annulling the lower judgment. The ruling governs the tax base of the Spielbankenabgabe, which funds the Swiss old-age pension scheme.

What this case is about

Eidgenössische Spielbankenkommission (ESBK) gegen X., docket 2C_320/2012, is a tax judgment of the Bundesgericht, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (II. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung), on the federal casino levy for 2009. The ESBK appealed in April 2012 against a casino operator, anonymised as X.

The dispute is about the tax base. The Bundesverwaltungsgericht had excluded the commissions casinos charge at poker and other table games from the gross gaming revenue on which the levy is assessed.

The ESBK relied on SBG art. 40 para. 2 (Bruttospielertrag, Spieleinsatz) and the VSBG. The case is one of the leading rulings in gambling tax litigation.

Who is covered

The ruling binds the casino operator in this case and sets the tax base for the Spielbankenabgabe more widely. Two parallel judgments of the same day, 2C_321/2012 and 2C_322/2012, were decided against two other casinos and were not joined to this one.

The levy funds the Swiss old-age pension scheme. For other Swiss disputes, see gambling lawsuits in Switzerland.

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case for players. The money is a tax assessment owed by casinos to the Swiss state, and the record shows no fund or claim process.

The three judgments of 31 August 2012 carry the following assessments, in Swiss francs.

Docket Levy (CHF) Gross gaming revenue (CHF) Court costs on casino (CHF)
2C_320/2012 4,799,814.69 11,962,962.65 3,000
2C_321/2012 54,249,839.04 97,550,429.16 12,000
2C_322/2012 27,131,789.95 58,381,159.58 3,000

What the court decided

On 31 August 2012 the Bundesgericht upheld the ESBK's appeal and annulled the Bundesverwaltungsgericht judgment of 14 March 2012. It held that "Spieleinsatz" covers everything the player puts into the pot, so the commission is part of gross gaming revenue under the clear wording of the ordinance.

The court reinstated the ESBK's assessment of 16 December 2010: a Spielbankenabgabe for 2009 of CHF 4,799,814.69 on gross gaming revenue of CHF 11,962,962.65. It put court costs of CHF 3,000 on the casino.

As of 14 November 2026 the case shows as decided, and the record lists no later step.

Why it matters

The ruling fixes what a casino must count when it reports gross gaming revenue. Commissions on poker and other table games belong in the base, and a casino that leaves them out is under-reporting under the court's reading.

The tax treatment of money players receive is a separate question, covered in are gambling settlement payments taxable.

Questions people ask

What did the Bundesgericht decide in 2C_320/2012?

It held that table-game commissions are part of the gross gaming revenue taxed by the Spielbankenabgabe. The Bundesverwaltungsgericht judgment of 14 March 2012 was annulled.

How much tax was at stake?

In 2C_320/2012 the levy for 2009 was CHF 4,799,814.69 on gross gaming revenue of CHF 11,962,962.65. The parallel cases involved CHF 54,249,839.04 and CHF 27,131,789.95.

Do players receive anything from this case?

No payout exists. The levy is a tax paid by casinos, and it funds the Swiss old-age pension scheme.

Who is involved

Plaintiffs: Eidgenössische Spielbankenkommission (ESBK / CFMJ) (appellant)

DefendantsX. (casino operator, anonymised)
Claims
  • SBG art. 40 Abs. 2 (Bruttospielertrag, Spieleinsatz)
  • VSBG (Spielbankenabgabe)

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case as of 14 Nov 2026. The court record shows assessment of CHF 4,799,814.69 Spielbankenabgabe 2009 on CHF 11,962,962.65 gross gaming revenue reinstated; CHF 3,000 costs on the casino.

What happens next

No future date is on the record we hold. The case is closed on the record we hold; later appeals or enforcement steps would be added here.

Timeline

2 dated steps on record, oldest first. Future dates come from court notices and can move.

DateEvent
Apr 2012Filed
31 Aug 2012Judgment entered

Documents and sources

3 primary sources (court file, administrator notice, regulator) and 0 secondary. Press is supporting evidence only.

What it supportsSourceTypeRetrieved
BGer 2C_320/2012 of 31 Aug 2012: Beschwerde gutgeheissen, BVGer judgment of 14 March 2012 annulledservat.unibe.chprimary14 Nov 2026
2C_321/2012 is a separate judgment of 31 Aug 2012 (ESBK v. X., levy CHF 54,249,839.04 on GGR CHF 97,550,429.16, costs CHF 12,000) and 2C_322/2012 another (levy CHF 27,131,789.95 on GGR CHF 58,381,159.58, costs CHF 3,000); 2C_320/2012 page lists no joined casesbger.chprimary14 Nov 2026
2C_320/2012 of 31 Aug 2012: ESBK appellant v. X.; BVGer Abteilung I judgment of 14 March 2012 annulled; assessment of 16 Dec 2010: Spielbankenabgabe 2009 Fr. 4'799'814.69 on Bruttospielertrag Fr. 11'962'962.65; Gerichtskosten Fr. 3'000 on the casino (Beschwerdegegnerin)bger.chprimary14 Nov 2026

Last checked against the sources on 14 Nov 2026. Found an error? Tell us and we correct the record with a dated note.