GamblingLawsuits.org
  1. Home
  2. Cases
  3. Shareholder and Securities Lawsuits
  4. Star class action (Maurice Blackburn, stayed)

Case record · Shareholder and Securities Lawsuits

Star class action (Maurice Blackburn, stayed) (Supreme Court of Victoria): Status, Rulings and What It Means for Players

Status
Stayed (stayed)
As of
19 Sep 2023 · read from the court record
Court
Supreme Court of Victoria · First instance
Docket
S ECI 2022 04492
Judge
Nichols J
Filed
4 Nov 2022
Type
Class action, shareholder and securities lawsuits
Money
No settlement fund or award on record
Payout
No payout exists as of 14 Nov 2026

Status words follow the court record: a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Filing a settlement claim is always free.

What this case is about

Maurice Blackburn's competing Star proceeding (Travis Donald Drake, filed 4 November 2022, class period to 16 March 2022) was one of the four actions in the 2023 carriage contest; Slater and Gordon won carriage on 19 September 2023 and this action was permanently stayed ([2023] VSC 561). Listed by the firm as a past class action.

What this case is about

Drake v The Star Entertainment Group Ltd is a shareholder class action in the Supreme Court of Victoria, proceeding S ECI 2022 04492, filed by Maurice Blackburn on 4 November 2022.

Travis Donald Drake sued The Star Entertainment Group Limited on behalf of shareholders. The allegations are one side's claims and were not decided in this action.

The claims allege inadequate AML/CTF systems, misleading or deceptive conduct, continuous disclosure breaches and conduct contrary to the interests of shareholders as a whole. The case is one of the Crown and Star actions in Shareholder and Securities Lawsuits Against Gambling Companies.

Who is covered

The class is shareholders who acquired Star shares between 29 March 2016 and 16 March 2022. Nichols J is the judge.

Because the action is permanently stayed, the class is not being pursued in this proceeding. Other Star matters are listed on Star Entertainment Lawsuits.

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case. The action is permanently stayed, the record shows a fund of AUD 0 and no settlement, and there is no claim process.

The class period and allegations describe a claim, not a finding that Star owes shareholders money.

What the court decided

On 19 September 2023 the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled in [2023] VSC 561 on a contest over which of four competing Star proceedings should go ahead. The four were filed in the order Lynch, Drake, Jowene and Huang. Slater and Gordon won carriage, and this action was permanently stayed.

As of 14 November 2026 the status is stayed. Maurice Blackburn lists the action as a past class action. Other Australian matters are on Gambling Lawsuits in Australia.

Why it matters

The ruling in this case concerns which proceeding goes ahead, not whether Star is liable. A carriage contest of this kind decides which firm runs the shareholder claim.

More Crown and Star shareholder cases are tracked under Shareholder and Securities Lawsuits.

  • DA Lynch Pty Ltd v The Star Entertainment Group Ltd: another of the four competing Star shareholder actions; status filed. DA Lynch v Star Entertainment

Questions people ask

Why was this action stayed?

It was one of four competing Star shareholder proceedings. On 19 September 2023 the Supreme Court of Victoria decided carriage in favor of Slater and Gordon and permanently stayed this action ([2023] VSC 561).

Did Maurice Blackburn's action produce a payout?

No. The record shows no fund, no settlement and no claim process in this action. The fund field is AUD 0.

Who did the action cover?

Shareholders who acquired Star shares between 29 March 2016 and 16 March 2022, with Travis Donald Drake as the named plaintiff.

Who is involved

Plaintiffs: Travis Donald Drake for shareholders who acquired Star shares 29 March 2016 to 16 March 2022

DefendantsThe Star Entertainment Group Limited
Class counselMaurice Blackburn
JudgeNichols J
Claims
  • inadequate AML/CTF systems
  • misleading or deceptive conduct
  • continuous disclosure breaches
  • conduct contrary to the interests of shareholders as a whole

If you need a lawyer, start with the court-appointed class counsel named above or the bar association referral service of your state or country. This site does not refer readers to law firms.

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case as of 14 Nov 2026. A settlement or judgment would have to come first, and any claim procedure would be announced by the court-appointed administrator, never by this site.

What happens next

No future date is on the record we hold. The next step is a court order, a dismissal, a settlement or a judgment; this page changes when one is entered.

Timeline

2 dated steps on record, oldest first. Future dates come from court notices and can move.

DateEvent
4 Nov 2022Filed
19 Sep 2023Stayed

Documents and sources

1 primary source (court file, administrator notice, regulator) and 1 secondary. Press is supporting evidence only.

What it supportsSourceTypeRetrieved
filing date 4 November 2022, class period, allegationsmauriceblackburn.com.aun/a14 Nov 2026
proceeding S ECI 2022 04492 filed 4 November 2022 by Maurice Blackburn for Travis Donald Drake, permanently stayed 19 September 2023; filing order Lynch, Drake, Jowene, Huangsupremecourt.vic.gov.auprimary14 Nov 2026

1 case in the record share parties, claims or a settlement with this one.

CaseCourtStatus
Star Entertainment shareholder class action (Slater and Gordon)Supreme Court of VictoriaFiled, pending

Last checked against the sources on 14 Nov 2026. Found an error? Tell us and we correct the record with a dated note.