GamblingLawsuits.org
  1. Home
  2. Cases
  3. Prediction Market Lawsuits
  4. Kalshi v. Minnesota prediction-market ban

Case record · Prediction Market Lawsuits

Kalshi v. Minnesota prediction-market ban: Allegations, Court Orders and Status

Status
On appeal (appealed)
As of
27 Jul 2026 · read from the court record
Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota · First instance
Docket
0:26-cv-02778-KMM-DTS (D. Minn.); heard with 0:26-cv-02661 and 0:26-cv-02841
Judge
Katherine Menendez (D. Minn.)
Filed
27 May 2026
Type
Operator v. regulator, prediction market lawsuits
Money
No settlement fund or award on record
Payout
No payout exists as of 14 Nov 2026

Status words follow the court record: a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Filing a settlement claim is always free.

What this case is about

Minnesota enacted the first state statute making it a felony to operate a prediction market (Minn. Stat. 609.7615, effective 1 August 2026). The CFTC sued on 19 May 2026, Kalshi on 27 May 2026 and Polymarket US on 4 June 2026. After argument on 2 July 2026, Judge Menendez granted all three preliminary injunctions on 27 July 2026, barring enforcement of the statute against CFTC-registered designated contract markets until final judgment, with the bond waived. Minnesota appealed (8th Cir. No. 26-2905). Kalshi remains available in Minnesota.

What this case is about

KalshiEX LLC v. Ellison is a federal suit filed on 27 May 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, docket 0:26-cv-02778-KMM-DTS, against Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and state officials. It is one of the Prediction Market Lawsuits over whether states can ban event-contract exchanges.

Minnesota enacted the first state statute that makes it a felony to operate a prediction market, Minn. Stat. 609.7615, effective 1 August 2026.

Kalshi argues that the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 2(a)(1)(A)) gives the federal government exclusive jurisdiction over swaps on designated contract markets, and that the Supremacy Clause (U.S. Const. art. VI) bars the state law.

The case was heard with two companions: United States v. Minnesota (0:26-cv-02661) and QCX LLC v. Ellison (0:26-cv-02841). The CFTC sued on 19 May 2026 and Polymarket US on 4 June 2026.

Who is covered

The ruling protects CFTC-registered designated contract markets from enforcement of the Minnesota statute until final judgment. Kalshi, the CFTC and Polymarket US are the plaintiffs. The case is not a class action.

For players, the practical question is the state picture, covered in Is Kalshi Legal in Minnesota? Kalshi remains available in Minnesota as of 14 November 2026.

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case. It is a challenge to a state statute, the plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, and no money fund or claim process exists.

Nobody needs to file anything, and players have nothing to claim.

What the court decided

After argument on 2 July 2026, Judge Katherine Menendez granted all three preliminary injunctions on 27 July 2026. The order bars enforcement of Minn. Stat. 609.7615 against CFTC-registered designated contract markets until final judgment, and the bond was waived.

A preliminary injunction is an interim order, not a final decision on the merits. Minnesota has appealed to the Eighth Circuit (No. 26-2905), and as of 14 November 2026 that appeal is pending, according to a secondary report.

Why it matters

The statute is the first state law making it a felony to operate a prediction market, and the 27 July 2026 order blocks it for now. The Eighth Circuit appeal will test the reasoning, and the case belongs to the wider split over whether sports event contracts are swaps.

That split is explained in How Is Kalshi Legal?

  • United States and CFTC v. State of Minnesota (GL-US-0649), appealed: CFTC v. Minnesota is the federal government's companion suit.
  • QCX LLC (Polymarket US) v. Ellison (GL-US-0673), appealed: Polymarket v. Ellison is the Polymarket companion.

Questions people ask

Status depends on court orders. A federal preliminary injunction of 27 July 2026 bars enforcement of the state felony statute against CFTC-registered exchanges, and Minnesota's appeal (8th Cir. No. 26-2905) is pending.

Can you actually sue sportsbook gambling?

Players can sue in some settings, but this case is an operator challenge to a state law. It creates no claim for individual players.

Who profits from prediction markets?

This case does not address profits. It concerns whether Minnesota may criminalize operating a prediction market, and the court has blocked that for now.

Who is involved

Plaintiffs: KalshiEX LLC

DefendantsKeith Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General; State of Minnesota officials
JudgeKatherine Menendez (D. Minn.)
Claims
  • Commodity Exchange Act preemption (7 U.S.C. 2(a)(1)(A) exclusive jurisdiction over swaps on DCMs)
  • Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const. art. VI
  • Minn. Stat. 609.7615 (prediction-market felony statute, SF 3432/SF 4760) challenged

Is there a payout?

No payout exists in this case as of 14 Nov 2026. A settlement or judgment would have to come first, and any claim procedure would be announced by the court-appointed administrator, never by this site.

What happens next

No future date is on the record we hold. The next step is a court order, a dismissal, a settlement or a judgment; this page changes when one is entered.

Timeline

2 dated steps on record, oldest first. Future dates come from court notices and can move.

DateEvent
27 May 2026Filed
27 Jul 2026On appeal

Documents and sources

2 primary sources (court file, administrator notice, regulator) and 2 secondary. Press is supporting evidence only.

What it supportsSourceTypeRetrieved
PI granted 27 July 2026 in all three cases; statute and effective date; bond waivedgovinfo.govprimary14 Nov 2026
filed 27 May 2026; argued 2 July 2026mickbransfield.comsecondary14 Nov 2026
8th Cir. 26-2905 pendingfoley.comsecondary14 Nov 2026
Order on plaintiffs' motions for preliminary injunction, Doc. 76, filed 27 Jul 2026 (Judge Menendez), covering 0:26-cv-02661, 02778 and 02841: motions granted, enforcement of Minn. Stat. 609.7615 against the plaintiffs enjoined pending final judgmentgovinfo.govprimary14 Nov 2026

2 cases in the record share parties, claims or a settlement with this one.

CaseCourtStatus
CFTC v. MinnesotaU.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota; Eighth Circuit (No. 26-2905)On appeal
Polymarket US v. MinnesotaU.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaOn appeal

Last checked against the sources on 14 Nov 2026. Found an error? Tell us and we correct the record with a dated note.