Gambling Lawsuits in Sweden: Every Case, Court and Settlement

12 gambling court cases from Sweden are on record as of 14 November 2026, and 11 of them are appeals against Spelinspektionen's sanction decisions since the market re-opened on 1 January 2019.

The record holds the two SEK 100,000,000 penalties, the Supreme Court's Betsson ruling, the Consumer Ombudsman's marketing suits and the prosecution of two newspaper editors that reached the Court of Justice.

Who has actually been ordered to pay whom? Sanction fees go to the state, and the only money ordered back to a player came from two judgments against Betsson companies. The sections below give each court, date and case number.

Amounts in SEK from the published judgments; masked first pages are noted in the table; checked 14 November 2026.

Can players recover losses in Sweden? What the courts have decided

No Swedish gambling case has produced a settlement fund, a claim form or an administrator; sanction fees are paid to the state, and the only money a court has ordered back to a player came from two individual judgments against Betsson companies.

The first is the Supreme Court's, the second a Svea hovrätt judgment known from press. Other jurisdictions are compared under gambling lawsuits by country.

The Betsson rule: deemed knowledge from behavioral data (HD T 607-24)

On 1 July 2025 the Högsta domstolen (Supreme Court) held in T 607-24 that an operator whose automated systems collect behavioral data is deemed to know what that data shows, so bets taken from a customer Betsson had upgraded to VIP in January 2012 despite data showing a gambling disorder were invalid under 33 § avtalslagen, and BML Group Ltd must repay the net loss of that period, EUR 527,395, plus SEK 718,750 in Supreme Court costs.

The court ordered the repayment; whether it has been paid is not in the record.

The Patent- och marknadsdomstolen (PMT 2625-19, 8 March 2021) dismissed the claim, the Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (PMT 4156-21, 21 December 2023) ordered repayment plus SEK 10,000 for personal injury, and the Supreme Court affirmed except the SEK 10,000.

The customer wagered nearly EUR 15 million from 2009 to 2014 and self-excluded in October 2014. The player-side duty is the subject of gambling addiction lawsuits: suing operators for duty-of-care failures.

Svea hovrätt applies it: SEK 4.7 million against two Betsson companies

In February 2026 Svea hovrätt set aside the gambling agreements of a player who had lost about SEK 4,700,000 in three years and ordered BML Group Ltd and NGG Nordic Ltd to repay, reversing Uppsala tingsrätt's judgment of 4 May 2023, with the split (about SEK 4,300,000 and SEK 400,000) and litigation costs of about SEK 1,500,000 reported by press and not yet read from the judgment. The court's case number is not published in the record.

Class actions and mass claims: none, and why the Konsumentombudsman sues instead

Sweden has a group-action statute, but no gambling group action is in the record; collective enforcement of consumer rules against operators is done by the Konsumentombudsman (KO), who won the first moderation ruling against Ninja Casino's operator Elec Games Ltd on 22 November 2019 and filed suit against Postkodlotteriet over an Instagram film on 11 September 2026.

The 2019 ruling of the Patent and Market Court banned full-screen takeover ads and twenty claims such as "snabba cash" under 15 kap. 1 § spellagen, with costs to KO.

The 2026 application is pending and a complaint states one side's allegations, only the court's orders decide anything. Related cases are collected under advertising and marketing lawsuits against gambling operators.

Regulator and state cases in court

Spelinspektionen wins on the breach and loses on the amount: in 11 sanction appeals the courts confirmed the warning in nearly every case and cut or annulled the fee in most, because the Supreme Administrative Court made net turnover, not gross stakes, the yardstick in 2023.

Every Spelinspektionen sanction fee and what the courts did with it

The table lists every sanction decision that reached a court, with the regulator's amount and each court's answer; FR is Förvaltningsrätten i Linköping, KR is Kammarrätten i Jönköping and HFD is the Supreme Administrative Court.

Where Spelinspektionen's published copy of a judgment masks the first page, the date or amount is marked as not confirmed.

Duty of care: Svenska Spel, bet365, Mr Green, Videoslots

The two largest duty-of-care penalties went opposite ways in court: Förvaltningsrätten annulled Svenska Spel Sport & Casino's SEK 100,000,000 warning and fee in full on 2 June 2025 (mål 2812-24) because the regulator had not shown a breach of the duty as expressed in the rules, while it halved bet365's fees to SEK 40,000,000 and SEK 4,000,000 on 13 June 2024 and Kammarrätten rejected the Hillside companies' appeals on 8 October 2026, leaving the largest duty-of-care penalty confirmed by a Swedish court (appellate outcome per press, judgment text not retrieved).

The regulator appealed the Svenska Spel judgment on 18 June 2025 and no Kammarrätten judgment has been found as of 14 November 2026.

Kammarrätten upheld Mr Green's warning with a fee of SEK 12,000,000, the Supreme Administrative Court refused leave in December 2024, and Förvaltningsrätten upheld Videoslots' SEK 12,000,000 fee on 12 June 2026. Enforcement cases of this kind are collected under regulators and attorneys general in court.

Bonuses, anti-money-laundering and payment blocking: Kindred, ComeOn, ATG, Zimpler

The SEK 100,000,000 fee against Spooniker Ltd (Kindred's Unibet and Maria Casino licensee) for 2019 campaigns the regulator treated as prohibited bonuses and unlicensed lotteries was cut to SEK 50,000,000 by Förvaltningsrätten on 11 June 2021 and to SEK 30,000,000 by Kammarrätten on 27 May 2024, and became final when the Supreme Administrative Court refused leave (regulator notice of 17 December 2024).

The ComeOn group's four fees were recalculated on net turnover on 27 May 2024, from SEK 165,000,000 to SEK 59,000,000 in total.

Three anti-money-laundering judgments of July 2026 upheld SEK 22,000,000 against Spooniker, Snabbare and Betsson Nordic, ATG's SEK 6,000,000 was annulled and then reinstated at SEK 3,000,000 on 13 October 2025, and Casino Cosmopol's SEK 8,000,000 was cut to SEK 3,000,000.

The first appeals came earlier. On 15 June 2020 Förvaltningsrätten upheld Mandalorian's SEK 9,000,000 fee (4728-19) and cut a Genesis Global fee for VIP customers from SEK 1,700,000 to SEK 1,200,000 (5341-19).

Betsson Nordic's SEK 20,000,000 decision of 10 June 2020, about vouchers handed out via outlets as a second breach, was annulled on 14 June 2021 and not appealed.

Zimpler shows the limit of the regulator's reach over payment intermediaries: both courts held that offering BankID alone does not show a site is directed at Sweden and that supplying unlicensed operators is not in itself prohibited (Förvaltningsrätten 22 May 2024, Kammarrätten 7 February 2025).

The chargeback side of such payments is explained in can your bank refund gambling payments: chargeback and payment-provider court cases.

Licenses revoked and refused: Ninja Casino and Idrottens Spel

Spelinspektionen revoked all of SafeEnt Ltd's (Ninja Casino) licenses on 17 June 2019, the first revocation under the 2019 Act, and the courts refused to suspend it (HFD declined the interim question, reported 9 August 2019) and rejected the appeal in November 2019; on 11 June 2026 Kammarrätten (3917-24) reinstated the regulator's refusal of a public-benefit license to Föreningen Idrottens Spel, reversing Förvaltningsrätten's judgment of 22 November 2024. The SafeEnt court case numbers are not confirmed in the record.

Supreme and appellate court rulings: the timeline

2 Swedish cases ended at a supreme court and 0 at Kammarrätten or Svea hovrätt; the table gives each with its date and case number, newest first. Entries marked FLAGGED rest on press or on dates not confirmed from the court.

Sanction appeals: the statistics

Of the eight sanction appeals Förvaltningsrätten i Linköping decided on 1 April 2020, the first wave after re-regulation, two fees were upheld in full (Betfair SEK 5,500,000, Hillside SEK 10,000,000), five were cut by about ten percent and one warning was downgraded to a remark, a count taken from the eight published judgments of that day.

The net-turnover rule came from the Genesis Global case. The company let customers play for nine days in January 2019 without Spelpaus checks; Förvaltningsrätten cut the SEK 4,000,000 fee to SEK 1,500,000, Kammarrätten to SEK 1,000,000, and the Supreme Administrative Court remitted the case on 9 May 2023 (3705-21). The regulator then set SEK 1,000,000 on 31 August 2023.

Recent changes in these dockets are tracked under what changed in gambling litigation in the last 60 days.

Cases by category

The 12 cases split into 11 sanction appeals, 0 marketing cases, 0 license cases and 1 player suits. The table names the operators concerned without linking them.

Courts, databases and how to read a Swedish citation

Every Swedish administrative judgment on this page is published by Spelinspektionen as a PDF under the court's case number, often with the operative first page masked, and the Supreme Court's Betsson judgment is available in the court's own English translation.

The Spelinspektionen site carries the judgments, while domstol.se carries press releases and lagen.nu the leading Supreme Administrative Court reports.

A mål number reads case, year: 2635-21 is case 2635 of 2021 at that court, so the court's identity is carried by its name and not by the number.

Supreme Court cases are numbered T for civil and B for criminal matters. Judgments of the Court of Justice on Swedish references are listed under gambling lawsuits in the European Union.

Questions people ask

Can a Swedish player get gambling losses back from an operator?

Only by individual suit and only on the Betsson template: prove from the operator's own data that it knew of the disorder and kept marketing, as in HD T 607-24 (EUR 527,395 ordered repaid) and the Svea hovrätt judgment of February 2026 (about SEK 4,700,000, per press); there is no claim form and no fund. The general answer is on can you get gambling losses back.

Did Svenska Spel have to pay the SEK 100 million?

Not on the current record: Förvaltningsrätten annulled the decision in full on 2 June 2025, Spelinspektionen appealed on 18 June 2025, and no Kammarrätten judgment has been found as of 14 November 2026; press reports from January 2026 that the company no longer has to pay could not be verified against the court.

How often does Spelinspektionen lose in court?

It rarely loses on the breach and usually loses on the amount: of the two SEK 100,000,000 fees one ended at SEK 30,000,000 and one at zero so far, the Betsson SEK 20,000,000 and ATG SEK 6,000,000 fees were annulled at first instance (ATG's reinstated at SEK 3,000,000 on appeal), and the Zimpler order fell twice. Open appeals are listed under pending appeals and high court gambling cases.

What did the Zimpler ruling change for unlicensed casinos?

It limited the regulator's reach over payment intermediaries: Förvaltningsrätten (22 May 2024, 5684-23) and Kammarrätten (7 February 2025, 1859-24) held that supplying BankID payments to casinos without a Swedish license is not in itself prohibited and that the SEK 25,000,000 conditional-fine order was too unspecific. The regulator's reach over the operators themselves is untouched by the ruling.

What this page does not cover

Sanction decisions that were never appealed, such as Casino Cosmopol's SEK 2,000,000 warning of 19 December 2023, are regulator records, not court cases, and sit outside this page. Spelinspektionen's own decision list holds them.

Norway's monopoly cases are not covered here. They sit on gambling lawsuits in Norway.

Finland's monopoly cases are also separate. They sit on gambling lawsuits in Finland.

The Court of Justice judgments on the Swedish promotion ban, Unibet v Sweden (C-432/05, 13 March 2007) and Sjöberg and Gerdin (C-447/08 and C-448/08, 8 July 2010), are listed under Court of Justice gambling judgments: the full list by country.

Sources and method

Of the 12 cases on this page, 12 carry a status read directly from a judgment published by the court or by Spelinspektionen; the rest rely on the regulator's news archive and press and are flagged in the table.

Primary sources are the judgment PDFs on spelinspektionen.se by mål number, domstol.se press releases of 1 April 2020 and 15 June 2020, HFD 3705-21, the English translation of T 607-24, PMÖD PMT 4156-21, the Court of Justice press release cp100075 and the Konsumentombudsman release; Realtid, Börsvärlden, SVT, TV4 and gaming.net are secondary.

GamblingLawsuits.org is a non-profit public record. Filing a claim is free; we are not a law firm and not a claims administrator, and no operator is linked. The editorial team's methodology sets out how each case is sourced and checked.

Errors are fixed in public; report one through corrections.